Which option illustrates a correct sequence for solving problems, from understanding the issue to verifying a solution?

• A. Gather data, define problem, choose solution, generate options, verify.
• B. Define problem, verify results, gather data, generate options.
• C. Define problem, gather data, generate options, choose a solution, verify results.
• D. Define problem, choose solution, gather data, verify results, generate options.

Answer: (C)

Solving problems well follows a logical flow: define the problem, gather information to understand it, generate possible solutions, choose the best one, and then verify that the chosen solution actually fixes the issue. Defining the problem first makes clear what success looks like and what constraints apply. Gathering data after that ensures you’re collecting relevant facts rather than random details. Generating options comes next, because you need a range of possibilities to compare before deciding. Choosing the best solution relies on weighing the available options against the problem’s criteria. Finally, verifying results confirms the solution works in practice and meets the intended goals, catching any gaps or unintended effects before finalizing.

Other sequences break this logic. Gathering data before defining the problem can lead to collecting information that isn’t needed or relevant. Verifying results before you have a solution or data to verify with is premature. Choosing a solution before exploring options and understanding the problem undermines effective evaluation. Verifying after generating options makes sense, but sending the steps out of order undermines the whole process.